- The Flytrap
- Posts
- The Substance Asks the Question: Can Hollywood Escape Its Own Beauty Standards?
The Substance Asks the Question: Can Hollywood Escape Its Own Beauty Standards?
The latest feminist film about society’s obsession with youth never answers its own question.
🛑 HOLD UP THERE, FRIEND! READ THIS FIRST! 🛑
WE’VE MOVED! You’re reading this on an archived version of The Flytrap that exists only to preserve links to content we published before August 27, 2025.
To read this post and get new editions in your inbox every week, subscribe over at our new home on Ghost. (And if you’re already a paid Flytrap subscriber, you should have experienced an almost seamless transition to be able to read our content on Ghost, but if you aren’t able to do so, please reach out to the Flyteam at flyteam@theflytrapmedia.com.)
While we have you: The Flytrap merch store is now open! Get dripped out in the latest Flytrap merch or buy a poster from our collection.

Credit: Rommy Torrico
In The Substance, Elisabeth Sparkle is like most women who work in Hollywood: she built a career on looking good. Men want to be with her, and women want to be her, which Elisabeth obliges with a workout TV show reminiscent of Jane Fonda’s New Workout, which airs on a nondescript cable channel that seems to exist only to profit off Elisabeth’s fuckability. Also like most women who work in Hollywood, Elisabeth starts losing clout in the industry because – like all human women – she is aging, and her body isn’t as aspirational as it once was. When the grotesquely misogynistic producer of her show, Harvey (not sure if this is a Weinstein reference, it’s never made explicit, but my brain went there), decides she’s too old to be on TV and dismisses her unceremoniously, Elisabeth’s world crumbles.
Elisabeth is embodied onscreen by Demi Moore, an actress who has – much like Elisabeth – grown older in the public eye. Moore rose to fame in the early 1990s, starting her career as a model and breaking through as a movie star with her memorable (and sexy) role in the classic film Ghost (1990). Back in the day, Moore was one of the most desirable actresses of her generation, as well as the highest paid actress in the world. For her role in Striptease (1996), Moore was paid $12.5 million, an amount that was unprecedented at the time for a single performance. Casting Moore as Elisabeth was a stroke of genius – her striking looks and signature long, dark hair evoke Moore’s own Hollywood past as an intensely desirable woman.
Despite this summoning of the collective history of Moore’s desirability on the big screen, The Substance – like all movies that are deemed feminist in some way – raises the question of whether a film made in Hollywood can truly deliver a feminist critique of Hollywood-made beauty standards. As Moore’s depiction of Elisabeth evokes experiences of women’s body dysmorphia that all of us can probably relate to, Moore’s own desirability isn’t as accessible to most of us – and neither is the amount of financial power she has accrued because of her beauty in an industry that runs on looks.
Keep reading
“DeBÍ TiRAR MáS FOToS” is Bad Bunny’s Latest Decolonial Text
Bad Bunny’s new album places loss at the center of tropical paradise, elucidating vacation spots as colonial constructs.
Nicole Froio /
Virginity is Fake, So Why is it Still a Rite of Passage?
Despite its reputation as a sexist film, I rewatched “American Pie” and some parts still hold up for me, more than 25 years later.
Katelyn Burns /
Does It Really Matter if ASMR Is a Sex Thing?
The debate over whether ASMR is a fetish opens a can of worms about human sexuality — and workplace safety.
s.e. smith /